To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Contesting Now On 17 Meters? |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Nov 2014 07:24:14 -0800 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 11/4/2014 10:13 PM, Ronf404 wrote: I haven't heard them well enough to work them yet, but I've been trying. The seem to hear very well. I've been traveling and just returned home yesterday afternoon. So far, I've worked them on 30M CW, 17M SSB, and long path on 40M CW. They were very good copy on 30M, but I needed a Beverage to copy them on 40M and I needed the Noise Reduction turned on in my K3 to copy them on 17M. Short path for me is 11,000 miles. They were also loud on 20M RTTY around 00Z yesterday, but I didn't get through. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Contesting Now On 17 Meters?, Ronf404 via TenTec |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Contesting Now On 17 Meters?, Ronf404 via TenTec |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |