TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Pan-Adaptor vs. Using BandMap with Ten-Tec Transceivers
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 07:19:14 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 11/5/2014 1:29 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
I AM STILL TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE BANDSCOPE (or Pan-Adaptor) WILL HELP
"ME" in "my way" of working DX contests.
I know it helps for other things, but how will it improve my contest score?

Let me count the ways. First, it finds signals on "empty" bands very quickly. Great for 6M and 10M, for example. Second, it finds a clear frequency where I can call CQ. Third, it finds signals that I can hear and work, not that someone else can hear but I cannot. Fourth, it finds signals on their actual frequency, rather than a wrong frequency that someone posted wrong.

It's also great in a DX pileup -- let's me find clear spots in the pileup, see how wide it is, see the frequency of the guy who just worked him, etc.

And it's great for tracking down noise -- I can see the drifting noise bumps of a switching power supply, see other broadband noise stuff.

And, if what you have is an Elecraft P3, you've got a measurement-quality spectrum analyzer with relative calibration of amplitude in dB and frequency in Hz or kHz, so you can measure the occupied bandwidth of a transmitter.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>