TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Eagle AT slow?

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Eagle AT slow?
From: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:43:30 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
I can explain why the tuner has to retune on the same frequency.......as stated by the operator " Leaving it on that frequency, a minute or so later a second try also took 15 seconds. A third tune, on the same frequency another minute later, took 10 seconds." Clearly the operator asked the ATU to perform a second and third tune routine on the same frequency. Why? No needed to do this in my experience.

Thanks, Bob and others, for a helpful discussion. I understand it a little better now. As to the question quoted above, obviously there's no operational reason to ask for a retune on the same frequency; it was an experiment to see what the tuner would do. (As I recall, if the 293B back home were asked to do this, it would just blink for a fraction of a second, indicating it already had a match.)

I agree with Bob on the "value added." Space is tight here at the camp, and I appreciate both eliminating an external tuner and being able conveniently to use the mobile bracket to mount the Eagle to the bottom of a bookcase shelf (QRZ dot com photo). (No plans to mobilize the Eagle; I use a 706IIG for that. The detachable face plate is a great feature.)

--John K3GHH/2

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>