TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 17:50:47 +0200
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
But it affects all of us.
So it's our misery too.

BTW, though Ten-Tec doesn't produce any really bad ones, their signals are far 
from being good.
The TX IMD of the Kenwood TS-590 is not particularly good . . . yet it is 
better than my Eagle.
:-(

(so I work CW - hi).

73
Rick, DJ0IP


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of k6jek
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:46 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production

Perhaps the lack of emphasis on transmit cleanliness is that it's somebody 
else's misery

On Jul 1, 2013, at 8:34 AM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:

> Well if we are pointing out Rob Sherwood points, let's not forget that ONE 
> BIG POINT he makes is, there is no further need to continue work on the 
> receiver technology now, until we fix the dirty transmitters on the band.
> 
> Why is it nobody ever wants to talk about this?  Everyone talks receiver, 
> receivers, receivers....
> 
> A good receiver is one that does not crunch in the presence of a strong 
> station on a neighboring channel.
> But if that station is a strong signal using many of today's rigs, driving an 
> amp, he's not just on the neighboring channel.
> He's splattering across your frequency and there are no receiver features for 
> removing that.
> 
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ted 
> Bryant
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:12 PM
> To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
> 
> Amen, Bob. 
> 
> In addition to the audio issues in current radios, Sherwood has demonstrated 
> how AGC performance can seriously affect the ability to copy stations in the 
> presence of noise, especially pulse-type noise.  AGC performance is yet 
> another factor rarely mentioned and certainly not reflected in "the charts". 
> 
> A couple more interesting (and often overlooked) points that Sherwood makes:
> 1 - receiver requirements are more demanding for cw contesting/DXing 
> than ssb
> 2 - a receiver with about 80db dynamic range is entirely adequate for 
> most contesting/DXing situations
> 
> 73, Ted W4NZ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bob 
> McGraw - K4TAX
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:08 AM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
> 
> Rick brings forward a point which is one objection that I find with the use 
> of the Sherwood Engineering report, i.e. "the charts".
> 
> ***** Let me make it clear, Rob's test data and tests are very 
> accurate, very useful and very valid.  *****
> 
> The fallacy is hams seem to believe solely in the ranking position on the 
> report and they fail to acknowledge that radios are ranked according to ONE 
> FACTOR only.    They seem to neglect other factors which I find to equally 
> or in some cases more important.
> 
> To Ricks point, if a radio for example, is rated in the top 10 in the "chart" 
> and it has poor audio as some do, then does this make it a great radio?  My 
> take, if it has a great receiver performance but has bad audio, 
> it is a lousy radio.   I agree totally with Rob's assessment presented at 
> Dayton in that a radio must be easy to use and enjoyable to use.  Failing 
> these two points, it is not a "good" radio regardless of the numbers or the 
> ranking position on the "charts".
> 
> I've found that the Sherwood Engineering report can be downloaded to an EXCEL 
> file where upon one can sort or parse the values based on 1 or 2 or 3 
> different values or parameters. Still even with this, it does nothing to 
> reveal the audio performance, TX performance or "use-ability" of a brand or 
> model.  To evaluate a product without having one side by side with another, 
> the reports including the Sherwood Engineering report, the product review by 
> ARRL Lab and by RSGB serve as outstanding sources.  I suggest taking these 
> reports and building ones own EXCEL spreadsheet to attain model by model 
> paper comparison.  Yet this still does nothing for the "usability"  factor.
> 
> In looking at the current "chart" publication (22 June 2013) , I find 
> that 7 of the top 10 lines are USA made products.  I think that 
> certainly speaks well of US designed and manufactured products.  This 
> of course is based on ONE FACTOR only.  :-)
> 
> 
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
> 
> 
>> Joe, don't just "take a look", use your ears and "listen" to the K3.
>> 
>> I did, and I compared it to an Eagle, side by side for about a month.
>> I sold the K3.  Crappy audio.
>> And NO, the firmware update did not fix it.  It just improved it.
>> It's still bad audio.
>> 
>> 73
>> Rick, DJ0IP
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe 
>> W2KJ
>> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 3:23 AM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
>> 
>> Take a look at the Elecraft K3...it's receiver(s) are at the top of 
>> the charts.
>> 
>> I have a K3 and really enjoy using it...best receiver I have used in
>> 51 years of hamming...oh, and the QSK ain't bad either (grin).
>> 
>> I sold my Orion a while back after being disappointed that Ten Tec 
>> didn't really follow up on firmware updates for many months after 
>> bugs were discovered and reported.
>> 
>> With John Henry back in the company hopefully that won't be the case 
>> anymore.
>> 
>> Interested in what Ten Tec will follow the Orion family with.
>> 
>> 73, Joe W2KJ
>> 
>> 
>>> That's my biggest concern that firmware development will cease...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I hope until Ten-Tec has a replacement for it’s flagship it will 
>>> continue to develop firmware releases for the Orion.  I also hope 
>>> the sub receiver upgrade will continue to be available for a 
>>> while...been saving my pennies for that addition to my Orion II.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It’s ashamed really...there is not another product in the market 
>>> positioned where the Orion II sits.  One has to spend a considerable 
>>> amount of money above the cost of the Orion II to purchase a desktop 
>>> transceiver (non-PC based) with the feature set the Orion II possesses.
>>> With Icom it’s the 7800 at $13000.00 or with Yaesu it’s the 5000 at 
>>> I don’t know how much.  (they dropped the 2000)  Now Kenwood has the
>>> 990 but it’s too new to be fully sorted out and it’s a few K$ more than the 
>>> OII....
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> There are many radios out there...but few with dual receivers and 
>>> dual tuning knobs which has become a must have in a DX radio for 
>>> me....  Don’t do point and click radio’s either....
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just a personal thing...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Guess that makes the Elecraft K3 the winner....at lease one can 
>>> start basic and grow it to the level of the radios mentioned above....
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cecil Acuff
>>> Gulfport MS
>>> K5DL
>>> 
>>> 
>>> From: Kim Elmore
>>> Sent: ‎June‎ ‎29‎, ‎2013 ‎4‎:‎06‎ ‎PM
>>> To: Bob Gibson; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>> CC: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
>>> 
>>> 
>>> All radios cease production at some point, so this was inevitable. 
>>> It doesn't make our radios worthless or perform any worse.
>>> 
>>> What's not clear is how much additional firmware development there 
>>> will be in the future. I hope TenTec doesn't cease all development, 
>>> but their resources are limited and we can't expect firmware 
>>> development to continue indefinitely. Someday, firmware support will have 
>>> to end.
>>> 
>>> Kim N5OP
>>> 
>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long 
>>> as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>> 
>>> On Jun 29, 2013, at 15:54, Bob Gibson <w5rg@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I wish I had known this two weeks ago when I bought a new one!!
>>>> 
>>>> Bob Gibson W5RG
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: PC Anderson <xtraham58@hotmail.com>
>>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 2:30 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like my comments were blocked.
>>>> Andy W3LI
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the heads up Ron.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Guess I'm shaking my head at why they couldn't "Eaglize" the Orion 
>>>>> RF design and update the controller/display/etc and end up with an 
>>>>> Orion III.
>>>>> I love the Orion form factor.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 73,
>>>>> Barry N1EU
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Ron Castro <ronc@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I just got this in the TenTec newsletter:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "On a rather sad note, about the time you read this message, we 
>>>>>> will have sold out of the last 566 Orion II transceiver.
>>>>>> Unfortunately, due to the availability of some very critical 
>>>>>> parts plus skyrocketing prices for difficult components, the 
>>>>>> staff at TEN-TEC decided to discontinue this product.  This does 
>>>>>> not mean we will not trade or sell used and demo Orion's and Orion II 
>>>>>> models.
>>>>>> We will continue service and support this product as we have done 
>>>>>> in the past with all TEN-TEC products.  Is a new Orion III on the 
>>>>>> horizon?  There are plans for several new TEN-TEC products lined 
>>>>>> up for the future but at this time no concise decision has been 
>>>>>> made for another Orion transceiver."
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All good things come to an end...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>          Ron Castro
>>>>>>           N6IE
>>>>>>    www.N6IE.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Member:
>>>>>>                      ARRL
>>>>>>     Redwood Empire DX Assn.
>>>>>> Northern California Contest Club
>>>>>> Northern California DX Foundation
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>