TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Station power supply??

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Station power supply??
From: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>
Reply-to: rmcgraw@blomand.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:51:39 -0500 (CDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The discussion at length explaining lightning damage and the efforts that
took place seem to indicate the lack of lightning protection outside of
the building but stressed the efforts of providing extensive grounding
inside the building for lightning protection.   Clearly all efforts for
lightning protection must be outside of the structure.  Never provide a
path or means that invites lightning into a building with the intent of
running it to ground.  All lightning protection efforts, arrestors, spark
gaps, suppressors and grounding must be outside of the structure.

The negative terminal of the power supply connected to chassis ground has
nothing to do with it.

73
Bob, K4TAX



> I think it's important to differentiate between electrical safety
> grounding and lightning protection grounding because I think that is some
> of the confusion.  The two are not the same and different techniques are
> used in the application of both.  The electrical safety grounding rules
> are outlined in the NEC or NFPA...but a proper electrical safety
> grounding system is a lousy lightning protection system in most all
> cases.  I noticed different grounding techniques mentioned in the recent
> posts and they are a mixture of both.  The station example with the
> ground buss across the station console is most likely a lightning
> protection application.  The thing to keep in mind is to not compromise
> electrical safety grounding in applying a lightning protection scheme.
> Any lightning protection grounding system has to be bonded to the
> electrical safety ground.
>
> Cecil
> K5DL
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 7:26 PM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9/5/2012 11:45 AM, Richards wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>    Is this notion of bonding the V- to chassis in any way
>>>    related one could get shocked when touching the
>>>    chassis of an old Halicrafters tube sets?
>>
>> NO. But it IS caused when the GREEN WIRE is not properly bonded to the
>> chassis, or when every chassis is not bonded to every other chassis and
>> to ground. That GREEN WIRE IS GROUND, coming all the way from the
>> breaker panel that feeds it. It's not a great RF ground, but it's a
>> great SAFETY ground, and it is required by LAW in virtually every
>> developed country. .
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Observation:
>>>
>>> [I am still taking Electronics 101.   But I remember the
>>> time I got stung touching a hot chassis.}
>>>
>>> I would have thought a serious concept like grounding stuff would be
>>> so important, it would be codified in a consistent set of rules even
>>> rookie operators could apply and follow.
>>
>> It is, that "codification is the National Electric Code (NEC), and
>> there is excellent material on this in recent editions of the ARRL
>> Handbook.
>>
>>> Also, I would have thought the product manufacturers would be on one
>>> track, with consistent instructions and consistency in the gear.
>>
>> The Astrons are DESIGNED correctly, but the PAINT is a manufacturing
>> defect.
>>
>>>
>>> But... NOOooo...  that would be too easy!   Consider, f'rinstance,
>>> this topic of grounding power supply chassis.   Nearly every rig needs
>>> a power supply.   Nearly every instruction manual says to ground each
>>> chassis to the other ones, and to a stick in the mud. Even TenTec says
>>> to do that in my transceiver user manual.
>>>
>>> OK... but then there is no ground lug on my TT 963 power supply. There
>>> is no ground lug on 2 of my Astron power supplies.
>>
>> Well, there is, it's called the GREEN WIRE.
>>
>>> There is no ground lug on my TT receiver, and similarly no ground lug
>>> on most of of my station accessories.  And yet they all have AC or DC
>>> power.
>>
>> That's unusual. Most ham rigs I've seen have a ground lug.
>>
>>> Some guys say to wire the green wire to the chassis (which I somehow
>>> get)  but then other guys debate wiring the negative to chassis (which
>>> I don't get, because I remember the sting of my old radio years ago).
>>> Some advocate adding a ground lug to the power supply chassis - but
>>> the manufacturer did not.
>>>
>>> And then TenTec service told me not to ground ANY of it unless I have
>>> a specific problem to solve, which just a little contradicts what it
>>> says in the instruction manual.  Some guys have grounding bars across
>>> the back of their desks.  Others don't have anything. One would have
>>> thought, if all these things are supposed to work together, there
>>> would be a common way of doing it.
>>
>> That's why it's important to develop an effective BS filter.  One of
>> the best BS filters is EDUCATION.  You're an attorney, as I recall, so
>> I'll bet you've got a pretty good BS filter in that field, and to some
>> extent with respect human nature and reading people. But until you
>> develop your technical BS filter (see education, above) you're always
>> going to be wondering who to believe.
>>
>>> Heck, now you guys say even Astron is inconsistent over time - and on
>>> the same model supply, too.   And now we are all wrangling over
>>> different rules and approaches to it.
>>
>> The only RULES here are that, BY LAW, EVERY exposed chassis MUST be
>> bonded to ground, if it's connected to the power line, it MUST be
>> bonded to the Green Wire, and ALL grounds MUST BE bonded together. And
>> for good RF performance, and to minimize hum and buzz, those bonds
>> should be short fat copper.
>>
>> FWIW, I've written extensively about all of this stuff in tutorials
>> that are on my website.  All you have to do is study them.
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>