TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RX366

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366
From: kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:06:38 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I really do hope they made some improvements as well as adding the 
audio peak function in V3.
73,
Lee



-----Original Message-----
From: Rsoifer <Rsoifer@aol.com>
To: tentec <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, Jan 31, 2012 12:31 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX366


In a message dated 1/31/2012 3:55:24 PM GMT Standard Time, 
kc9cdt@aol.com
writes:


> I don't notice that problem, but I don't use the NB, just the NR.  
Wait
for the V3 firmware.  For me, the NR (2.044A) is very good on CW, not 
so good
on SSB.

73 Ray W2RS

I find the NR is not very good here on the OII. Also the NB causes lots
>
> of clicking sound when a strong signal is ...well maybe within 10 KC 
or
> so.
> I really wish it was better....so...I rarely find an instance that it
> helps...
> Maybe I need to tweek some settings while using it??
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>