TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
From: kc9cdt@aol.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I would rather it have 6 than 160 IF I have to have one or the other...
73,
Lee



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gates <kd3jf@hotmail.com>
To: Ten Tec <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 9, 2011 5:37 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?


I will admit I have listened on 160 a few times but that is about it! I 
couldn't
care less if the radio did not have 160! Just my opinion at 81 years 
old!!

Paul Gates

> From: wn3vaw@verizon.net
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:48:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
> Yeah, boggles the mind, doesn't it?
>
> One person kvetched mightily about the 539 prototype, ending it with a
> comment, if memory serves, stating "If it won't have 160 I wouldn't 
even
> CONSIDER buying it!"
>
> 3 will get you 2 that if Ten-Tec does put 160 in the rig, he'd just 
find
> another excuse to not buy it and knock the rig.
>
> I guess some people would rather complain than operate.
>
> Meanwhile, there's a touch over 2 hours to go in the Pa QSO party, so 
if
> anyone wants to work an Omni VI+ or a Corsair II, give me a shout...
>
> 73
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com 
[mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Curt
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 2:13 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
> Complaining about a product that isn't for sale yet??!!!  Amazing.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
>
> > And already there are posts online on eHam and QRZ from people 
complaining
> > about them...
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
                                        
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>