I will admit I have listened on 160 a few times but that is about it! I
couldn't care less if the radio did not have 160! Just my opinion at 81 years
old!!
Paul Gates
> From: wn3vaw@verizon.net
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:48:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
> Yeah, boggles the mind, doesn't it?
>
> One person kvetched mightily about the 539 prototype, ending it with a
> comment, if memory serves, stating "If it won't have 160 I wouldn't even
> CONSIDER buying it!"
>
> 3 will get you 2 that if Ten-Tec does put 160 in the rig, he'd just find
> another excuse to not buy it and knock the rig.
>
> I guess some people would rather complain than operate.
>
> Meanwhile, there's a touch over 2 hours to go in the Pa QSO party, so if
> anyone wants to work an Omni VI+ or a Corsair II, give me a shout...
>
> 73
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Curt
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 2:13 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
> Complaining about a product that isn't for sale yet??!!! Amazing.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2011 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418?
>
>
> > And already there are posts online on eHam and QRZ from people complaining
> > about them...
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|