| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:43:27 -0700 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
On 9/1/2011 5:37 AM, Bill Tippett wrote: > It > simply has the benefit of being tested using*new* methodology versus > other rigs using the*old* methodology, and there is not even any > indication of when the measurement methodology was changed! Yes, this is a very big deal, because many of us would like to compare equipment of different vintages. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Bill Tippett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, jrhallas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, Bill Tippett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews, jrhallas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |