TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 08:43:27 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 9/1/2011 5:37 AM, Bill Tippett wrote:
> It
> simply has the benefit of being tested using*new*  methodology versus
> other rigs using the*old*  methodology, and there is not even any
> indication of when the measurement methodology was changed!

Yes, this is a very big deal, because many of us would like to compare 
equipment of different vintages.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>