TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:26:26 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
KO7I:

 >This is the most useful bit of info that has come across my computer's
screen in the past few months.

         And possibly the most misleading.  ARRL changed their 
methodology for measuring IMD around 2007 by using a 3 Hz BW spectrum 
analyzer to separate IMD effects from phase noise effects.  The human 
ear has ~50 Hz bandwidth at best  so their results are very 
misleading and not comparable to earlier ones listed on the same 
chart.  If you want meaningful (i.e. what you will hear with your own 
ears) results that are comparable over time stick to Sherwood's summary.

http://www.sherweng.com/table.html

                                         73,  Bill  W4ZV 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>