That's exactly right. I'm just saying I can do better on CW by
selecting the best filter for the conditions. And on SSB, I do better
by selecting the best filter and PBT value for the conditions. Your
mileage may vary.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Dr.
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com
On 5/18/2011 7:45 PM, Rsoifer@aol.com wrote:
> Bsrry and Carl,
>
> We're all entitled to our opinions, based on our own experience. All I
> can say is the NR (2.044A and 2.039d) helps me pull out weak CW signals on 80
> and 160, especially with a wide roofing filter. It also attenuates highs
> on SSB, so it can use improvement. This is, however, a firmware issue, not
> a hardware issue.
>
> 73 Ray W2RS
>
>
> In a message dated 5/18/2011 9:22:39 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
> barry.n1eu@gmail.com writes:
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:08 PM,<Rsoifer@aol.com> wrote:
>> I don't have a Yaesu 5000 to listen to, but I think all of us on this
>> reflector with Orion IIs agree that the DSP NR needs further work.
>
> Nope, not all of us. In fact, if my O2 (or O3) was missing a NR
> button, I wouldn't be disappointed.
>
> As far as the NR in the FT5K magically making unreadable signals
> readable, I'd love to hear a recording demonstrating that. Until
> then, I remain skeptical.
>
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|