>Point is, the ONLY custom chip is the EPROM, I have a shoe box full,
>but don't have the TenTec Omni VI code.
OK - gotcha. We'll see what happens. But is it the EPROM? I didn't see
where anyone said it was the problem for sure.
--
Neal, NL7VL
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:01:02 -0600
"Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net> wrote:
>Point is, the ONLY custom chip is the EPROM, I have a shoe box full,
>but don't have the TenTec Omni VI code.
>
>73, Jerry, K0CQ
>
>On 1/17/2011 6:55 PM, NL7VL wrote:
>> My experience in field troubleshooting in the days of discrete
>> components and early TTL/CMOS was that 90% of problems always had a
>> relationship to a connection - be it an IC socket, bad solder joint,
>> or faulty multi-pin connection on the module level. I would always
>> assume at the beginning that the semiconductors are OK except when
>> the board smelled!
>>
>> But with custom controller chips and the like that are flourishing
>> these days, I don't have the experience to comment on their
>> reliability one way or another. As I said earlier today, I'll talk
>> to TT tomorrow and try to get some information - and hopefully a TT
>> employee might even post a response to some of this.
>>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|