TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?

To: martin@ok1rr.com, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec the SSB company?
From: Michael Wilke <wb4aql@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:18:23 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I`ve been wondering the same thing...

Mike  WB4AQL


On 6/21/10, Martin <martin@ok1rr.com> wrote:
>
> It struck me dumb to see the 'Ten-Tec, the SSB company'. Our late Al
> Kahn, K4FW, must turn in his grave...
>
> Should it be a response to the no-code expansion? What's the TT's
> strategy for the future? With lack of support of Orion (565), some less
> sophisticated solutions (no memory tuner in 565, some software
> glitches...) will TT also leave the tradition of great CW features?
>
> 73
> Martin, OK1RR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>