TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 00:08:44 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Its because if the only tool you have is a hammer, then every problem looks 
like a nail !!!!   LOL

Seriously, labels are a bummer, and this is but one example of the point.

73


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Hunt" <steve@karinya.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us...


> I'll say it again folks: these are misleading labels!
>
> A load of 2+j10 needs the **same** configuration as a load of
> 1000+j1000: shunt C across the load.
> A load of 2+j9 needs the **same** configuration as a load of  49-j1000:
> shunt C across the source.
>
> Where's the sense in distinguishing these configurations as "High
> Impedance" and "Low Impedance"?
>
> Steve G3TXQ
>
> N4PY2 wrote:
>> The tentec 538 tuner is a reversible L.  That means it has 2 
>> configurations
>> for the L.  One for high impedance and one for low impedance.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>