To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us... |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Thu, 21 May 2009 11:54:48 +0100 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Can I correct one common misunderstanding about low-pass L-network tuners. The two network configurations (shunt C at the output, or shunt C at the input) do not correspond to Hi-Z and Lo-Z loads, despite the labelling you often see on the configuration switch. If you don't believe me take a look at a Smith Chart and see which areas need each configuration. As an example, a load of 2+j10 needs the shunt C across the load - that's the so-called "Hi-Z" configuration! 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Palstar tuner, Tony |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Re(Ten TEC) Palstar Tuner, Chris Hinson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us..., Charles Harpole |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TT and the rest of us..., Richards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |