TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield
From: "Chuck & Vicki Tifft" <cftifft@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 17:48:33 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I know there has been some claims to link Cancers to RF exposure, I am 
retired Broadcast transmitter guy, who spent more than 25 years exposed to 
high power transmitters from 550khz to 18ghz, and so far, so good. 
Interestingly I can not recall a single person who got leukemia, from the 
probably couple hundred or more people, I either worked with or knew from 
the business throughout the years. These are people who spent most of their 
working time around high RF fields. I am sure there nust have been some, 
because just the average population percentages would dictate that. But as 
for there being an unusually  high pertcentage in that group, I would have 
to disagree, because I certainly haven't seen it among those I know. Or 
maybe we all were just smart enough not to stare into the open end of a hot 
waveguide.
One more point, any well designed broadcast or commercial transmitter 
installation is going to include some type of output filtering in the 
transmission line, or at least some form of interference reduction device. 
whether it be a filter,isolator or whatever. It is just good engineering 
practice. Now you situation, may call for some other additional measures,but 
it is always good practice to be a clean as you can to start with.
Chuck
W6RD
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim WA9YSD" <wa9ysd@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 95% Shield


>
> The point is, "IT IS NO ENCOUNTERING SERIOUS TVI", the point is they get 
> TVI no matter how minimal, it is there and just bothers the neighbors. 
> The point is, they may not know how to contact the FCC to complain.
>
> If a good low pass filter is needed, take another look at your antennas 
> and feed line.  If there is a problem, the low pass filter is not 
> effective and you will not get the results your going to expect.  Once 
> that is accomplished the low pass filter may help.  A well designed radio 
> like Ten-Tec has this type of design and I feel it is not necessary to 
> have another one.  Most radio equipment has this type of filtering theses 
> days.
>
> Leukemia is linked to long term exposer to RF fields,  High percentage of 
> Radio engineers has it and/or died from it.
>
> Filter on a TV?  Does that work?  Not for me.  Been there tried that. 
> Google my QTH look at the residential area.  It is just like havening a TV 
> in your own home.  Common mode currents, Jim Brown is on the money.  Is it 
> worth the effort to do what manufacturers did not do?  You start offering 
> your services is like stirring  up a hornets nest.  Best is to take care 
> of your station and get it best you can then go to the neighbors if your 
> confident and capable to do it.  I am not capable  and confident enough to 
> go to the neighbors nor am I foolish enough to do it.  I am a chicken.
>
> Screen room?  Too much for my pocket book.  Especially all those filters 
> that are need for every wire in and out of it.  Screen room defeats the 
> purpose if you put a transmitter inside and an antenna outside.  Doesn't 
> it?
>
>
> Keep The Faith, Jim K9TF/WA9YSD
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>