To: | Rick Denney <rick@rickdenney.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield |
From: | Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 19:48:29 -0700 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Actually, on the robustness of digital TV. Reports in the trade press I receive tell of digital dropping out completely, and not having a graceful fall off in signal quality. Also, it is not able to have the range of service over the air they had postulated for it. It is much more sensitive to reflections, and signal path obstructions. The jury seems to be still out if it will be all its cracked up to be. Even its inventors admit, it will fail like falling off a cliff, rather than giving you a weak picture. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield, Rick Denney |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] False Alarm, Stuart Rohre |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield, Rick Denney |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] TVI 95% Shield, Rick Denney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |