TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey
From: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:09:41 -0700
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I don't remember that Fill-In-Blank question..

Dave


David J Drew  --  W7DPW
Over 50 Years with Same Call
Amateur Extra Since 1970
Continuous ARRL Member Since October 1957
ARRL Life Member October 1969
Vancouver, Washington  98664-4445




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ten-Tec Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey


> Joel R. Hallas wrote:
> > Yes, I wonder if it is particularly significant that one of the most
> > important features to me, a solid second receiver, did not make
their list!
> >
> > Regards, Joel
> > Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR
> >
> There is a fill-in-the blank question on the survey that asks you to
> tell us:
>
> What do you think is the most important item or feature on an HF
> transceiver?
>
> 73
> Scott Robbins
> W4PA
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>