| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey |
| From: | Ten-Tec Amateur Radio Sales <sales@tentec.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:07:56 -0400 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Joel R. Hallas wrote: > Yes, I wonder if it is particularly significant that one of the most > important features to me, a solid second receiver, did not make their list! > > Regards, Joel > Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR > There is a fill-in-the blank question on the survey that asks you to tell us: What do you think is the most important item or feature on an HF transceiver? 73 Scott Robbins W4PA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] HL-100BDX amp repair, RaySoifer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey, Bill Ames |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey, Joel R. Hallas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey, Bill Ames |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |