TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] CW monitor receivers

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] CW monitor receivers
From: "dw" <bw_dw@fastmail.fm>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:30:38 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Thanks Jim,
I should look for one.
I had an old Atlas 210x  that I modified years ag0 and put into storage.
Took it out and nada!
It was a great little unit in its day :)
I built into it a cw side-tone and vox.
I guess when I get a chance, I should dig into it.

Anyway, I    *** THINK *** I found at the problem.
I built a trifilar 1:1 balun as the front-end of my remote tuner
outside.
Tuning elements are on the load side of the balun.
Even with an swr below 2, I'm guessing it was saturating on 30.
I replaced it with some FB-73-2401 toroids over the shield ( W2DU type )
balun.
So far, sig reports are good.  ( knock on wood )

30 meters is one of my favorite bands, so crossing my fingers that its
back.  :)

On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:25:41 -0600, "JAMES HANLON" <knjhanlon@msn.com>
said:
> Duane,
> 
> An older receiver can be a good piece of test equipment if you have the
> room for it.  The Drake 2B would be an excellent receiver to use to check
> your CW note if it has a crystal to cover the 30 meter band.  There is
> also an ugly but apparently working Hammarlund HQ-129x on the e-place
> right now that will probably sell for peanuts because of its looks.  It
> would certainly give you an accurate reading on the quality of your
> signal.  
> 
> Jim, W8KGI
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
-- 
  dw
  dw@sover.net

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>