TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 2.033

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 2.033
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 23:48:45 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
> What you say about the "distortion" actually being the noise 
> that had been suppressed until the cw element or ssb signal 
> raised the gain is accurate. 

It's easily visible in a waterfall display.
http://mysite.verizon.net/nq5t/Misc/CWgram.png

I've never really figured out if you're right in your conclusion that NR is
a downward expander, but the one thing I'm absolutely certain of is that it
adds nothing to (S+N)/N ratio, and at any BW below about 1000 Hz actually
degrades it.  While it may reduce background noise during no-signal
conditions, the signal elements are buried in just as much noise with NR as
without.

I took the time to remeasure SNNR changes with NR=9 tonight, since the
subject reared its ugly and already too-beaten-to-death head again today.
These numbers are consistent (+/- a dB) with what I found the last time I
did it many weeks ago.

BW          Delta SNNR (NR=9)
-----------------------------
3000 Hz  + 1.0 dB
1000 Hz      - 0.4 dB
500  Hz      - 1.0 dB
100  Hz      - 2.0 dB

Disclaimers:  The usual stuff about not hating my Orion II, etc. :-)

Grant/NQ5T


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>