Any chance the Noise Reduction (NR) is active?
Ron, NU1U
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Chortek, Robert L
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 13:19
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ocean noise
I have the same issue. Much more noise than my FT1000D.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Tow [mailto:ttow1@charter.net]
Sent: Sat Feb 11 09:30:15 2006
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Ocean noise
Turning down the rf gain was the first thing I tried. Down to 50-60%..still
a LOT more noise than should be and much more than the MK 5. I still suspect
it is some setting but I have not had the time to mess with it. Probably
won't for several days so after my next bout with it, if I find it I will
report. To those who requested the updates, I will get to those also. 73,
Tommy WD4K
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of tentec-request@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:00 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: TenTec Digest, Vol 38, Issue 38
Send TenTec mailing list submissions to
tentec@contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
tentec-request@contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
tentec-owner@contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TenTec digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Now UPS Strikes Again (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX)
2. Re: Ten Tec User Net Activity (John Nason / NA9U)
3. Re: Now UPS Strikes Again (Lew)
4. hearing the ocean (Bill Tippett)
5. WTB- Accessories for 540 (Danny Shaver)
6. Re: Ten Tec User Net Activity (Martin, AA6E)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:49:42 -0600
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <001601c62f12$0272c2b0$c1b34ace@FAMILY>
Content-Type: text/plain; reply-type=original; charset=iso-8859-1;
format=flowed
Yes, but how does one protect from puncture through two boxes, the outside
one & inside one, puncture through two layers of 2" thick rigid foam and
thus leaving dents 1/4" deep and scratches on the equipment?
No drop involved.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lew" <ljl160@verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
>I learned that packing for UPS must withstand a good 6 foot drop at
>minimum
> I live near a main UPS drop off and I've seen just from the counter to the
> back room what happens. DHL is my new mode of shipping- its been very good
> so far. K1NDV
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
> Date: 02/10/06 23:11:52
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
>
> UPS is an absolute pain in the behind company to do business with. I too
> received a package via UPS in October. It was a "drop and run" job thus
> no
> signature. Damaged to such extent the outside of the box was torn, the
> inside packing was damaged, the inside box was torn and the inside packing
> damaged as well as the radio equipment. Filed a claim with UPS, then they
> said it had to go back through the shipping agent and they'd have to make
> a
> claim. Then they said the damage was due to inadequate packing. Come on
> folks, it doesn't take a high school drop-out to figure that one out.
> Well
> what would one expect? I guess if it were in a iron box it might have
> made
> it. Oh well the story continues.
>
> Well all was done as they requested. Pictures made and sent as requested.
> Package delivered to the local UPS office as requested. On and On and On
> and On. Finally, I figured that their tactic was to stall and stall and
> stall and perhaps I'd just go away. Well I didn't. I persisted in being
> a
> thorn in their behind day after day after day. Finally, after 4 months I
> got a check but only after they got a letter from my attorney and then a
> summons to appear in local court.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 06:27:13 -0800 (PST)
From: John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec User Net Activity
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <20060211142713.1822.qmail@web51914.mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
I have been hearing the net about 2:00 PM Central time
on or about 7.251. Much QRM from broadcasters. I
just got my O2 so I will be interested in seeing how
all the filtering will handle the carriers.
73,
John NA9U
--- David Hammond <dhhdeh@concentric.net> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Could someone please post the latest
> date/time/frequency info on any Ten Tec User Net
> Activity?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best 73 de N1LQ-Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:32:48 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: "Lew" <ljl160@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <43EDF590.000001.02956@CYNDI>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
The puncture wounds are new to me! Probably fork lift damage maybe??? I
have even double boxed and used some indoor -outdoor carpet along with
everything else however it adds weight to the shipping cost. I think that
DHL drivers have a vested interest in making things arrive in good shape-so
I hear. I shipped out a dozen or so items since last summer via DHL and it
worked for me. They were fast and cheaper than most. I even sent a large
cubical quad out west and it arrived in good shape. The package was 13 ft
long x 1 ft diam and about 50 lbs! 73 Lew/KlNDV
-------Original Message-------
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
Date: 02/11/06 09:06:12
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
Yes, but how does one protect from puncture through two boxes, the outside
one & inside one, puncture through two layers of 2" thick rigid foam and
thus leaving dents 1/4" deep and scratches on the equipment?
No drop involved.
73
Bob, K4TAX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lew" <ljl160@verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
>I learned that packing for UPS must withstand a good 6 foot drop at
>minimum
> I live near a main UPS drop off and I've seen just from the counter to the
> back room what happens. DHL is my new mode of shipping- its been very good
> so far. K1NDV
>
> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
> Date: 02/10/06 23:11:52
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: [TenTec] Now UPS Strikes Again
>
> UPS is an absolute pain in the behind company to do business with. I too
> received a package via UPS in October. It was a "drop and run" job thus
> no
> signature. Damaged to such extent the outside of the box was torn, the
> inside packing was damaged, the inside box was torn and the inside packing
> damaged as well as the radio equipment. Filed a claim with UPS, then they
> said it had to go back through the shipping agent and they'd have to make
> a
> claim. Then they said the damage was due to inadequate packing. Come on
> folks, it doesn't take a high school drop-out to figure that one out.
> Well
> what would one expect? I guess if it were in a iron box it might have
> made
> it. Oh well the story continues.
>
> Well all was done as they requested. Pictures made and sent as requested.
> Package delivered to the local UPS office as requested. On and On and On
> and On. Finally, I figured that their tactic was to stall and stall and
> stall and perhaps I'd just go away. Well I didn't. I persisted in being
> a
> thorn in their behind day after day after day. Finally, after 4 months I
> got a check but only after they got a letter from my attorney and then a
> summons to appear in local court.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:42:06 -0500
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: [TenTec] hearing the ocean
To: tentec@contesting.com
Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.0.20060211093934.009feb60@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed;
x-avg-checked=avg-ok-6D354E87
WD4K wrote:
>not including my trip to the ocean when I turn it on. :)
Before you throw it in the ocean, try
turning RF Gain down until the noise drops.
This is exactly the point I was making before
about users not setting RF Gain correctly and
complaining "My Orion is noisy". :-)
73, Bill W4ZV
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:19:11 -0600
From: "Danny Shaver" <n5nbk@nortexinfo.net>
Subject: [TenTec] WTB- Accessories for 540
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID: <000e01c62f1e$83212670$037dfea9@DannyShaver>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
I am still looking for accessories for my 540 (triton IV). I am primarily
looking for the digital readout and the 160 meter converter, but would
consider complete stations, or even a 544. Must be in good condition
electrically and cosmetically.
Thanks- Danny
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:48:25 -0500
From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec User Net Activity
To: na9u@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
<tentec@contesting.com>
Message-ID:
<6a2b366e0602110748m6e9adfc8v27c9cb49cb395e55@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I checked in once. Good news, bad news. Good: the Orion can pull
weak ham sigs out from between the broadcasters. Bad: It's still
hard to get through on 100W -- no fun on the East Coast! Why can't
there be a better time / freq? Mornings on 40 or evenings on 80 seem
like a better deal.
73 Martin AA6E (in CT)
On 2/11/06, John Nason / NA9U <na9u@arrl.net> wrote:
> I have been hearing the net about 2:00 PM Central time
> on or about 7.251. Much QRM from broadcasters. I
> just got my O2 so I will be interested in seeing how
> all the filtering will handle the carriers.
>
> 73,
> John NA9U
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
End of TenTec Digest, Vol 38, Issue 38
**************************************
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|