TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
From: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:01:54 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW????

CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW????

CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME NOW????


Pat-K4BEH

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:08:51 -0600 Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX
<RMcGraw@Blomand.Net> writes:
> How many times have you heard one give a signal report of 59 or such 
> then 
> followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"?  Now looking at that 
> analogy 
> of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong 
> 
> signals.  From that we must deduct that the transmitting station's 
> audio was 
> terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed deaf from 
> using 
> headphones for years.
> 
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:39 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
> 
> 
> > Be very careful,  Its my understanding that even
> > writing about headphones can cause a hearing loss
> >
> > HUH?   WHAT?  I CAN'T HEAR U
> >
> > Seems to me it isn't the headphones that are the
> > problem it's the crankin up the friggin volume thats
> > the problem
> >
> > 73  W9OY
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>