TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:08:51 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
How many times have you heard one give a signal report of 59 or such then 
followed by "can you repeat your name and QTH"?  Now looking at that analogy 
of that report, the 5 = Perfectly readable, and 9 = Extremely strong 
signals.  From that we must deduct that the transmitting station's audio was 
terrible or the receiving station operator was indeed deaf from using 
headphones for years.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee A Crocker" <lee_crocker@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 5:39 AM
Subject: [TenTec] Headphone alarmists


> Be very careful,  Its my understanding that even
> writing about headphones can cause a hearing loss
>
> HUH?   WHAT?  I CAN'T HEAR U
>
> Seems to me it isn't the headphones that are the
> problem it's the crankin up the friggin volume thats
> the problem
>
> 73  W9OY
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>