| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft? |
| From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:47:24 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
DJ0IP wrote:
>To be almost exact it is 3.05 ft. (and exactly 3.048 ft.)
Your memory is wrong Rick...but I know
how you got there because I recognized the
"3048" sequence. That is actually .3048 m/ft,
not 3.048 ft/m. As someone else stated the
actual value of ft/m is 3.281 ft, which comes
from 1/.3048. So a meter is about 10% longer
(~3.3') than a yard (3.0 ft).
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] WTB 706, Sonny Eisenberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits", Gary Hoffman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] WTB 706, Sonny Eisenberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ft/m or m/ft?, Mike Hyder -N4NT- |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |