TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth"
From: Ira Franklin <k4ymq@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Guess I just get nervous with some of their plans, still remember that they 
were the group that brought the great boon of incentive licenseing to ham radio.
 
Ira  K4YMQ


Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> wrote:
Martin, AA6E wrote:

>AM forever! - read the article:
>
Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the 
completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart 
representations would be complete and accurate.

>
>"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules
>continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent
>sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth
>limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively.
>
DE N6KB


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

                
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! 
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>