To: | "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:51:54 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Martin, AA6E wrote: >AM forever! - read the article: > Oops...I guess I did not read the text carefully enough, and made the completely rediculous assumption that the pictorial chart representations would be complete and accurate. > >"The EC made no change to its earlier recommendation that the rules >continue to permit double-sideband, full-carrier AM and independent >sideband (ISB) as specific exceptions to the 3 kHz bandwidth >limit--with restrictions of 9 kHz and 6 kHz respectively. > DE N6KB _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Real CW, Alfred Lorona |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Real CW, jerome schatten |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Martin, AA6E |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth", Ira Franklin |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |