To: | "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? |
From: | "Thomas Jednacz" <tjednacz@ieee.org> |
Reply-to: | tjednacz@ieee.org,Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:34:59 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Another reason is an L tuner only has one match point. A T tuner can have an apparent match and a real match. In the apparent match condition all the energy is going into the tuner and circulating with nothing going out the feed line. A switchable L tuner (L or C input) can have a wider match impedance range. Tom, W7QF > > The L network is more efficient by having losses in only two > components, an L and C vs. 3 components in the conventional Tee tuner. > _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Stuart Rohre |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, K4IA |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Stuart Rohre |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, K. Indart |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |