To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ? |
From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:22:39 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The L network is more efficient by having losses in only two components, an L and C vs. 3 components in the conventional Tee tuner. I think the Ten Tec components are usually pretty rugged. Any roller tuner should be mechanically checked from time to time and any looseness corrected. If the paint match is not possible, then any tuner might do. 73, Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Jeff Frank |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Thomas Jednacz |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Jeff Frank |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] tentec 238B or palstar 1500cv ?, Thomas Jednacz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |