To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Good faith & John Swisher KE4CCI (long) |
From: | "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:09:10 -0600 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
snip. Well at ga hamfest 3 months later traded for plus cash for a kenwood ts850sat. It was gaurenteeeed to be top notch. Just been to kenwood for realinement. You know the deal. 2 Days later at home it quit. snip. Would it made a difference if it had quit two weeks, or two months later? If you would of tested it at the fest, would that made a difference? This reminds me of an incident occuring in Germany. A Major Birch tried to make me guarentee that an AN/GRC-46 would work when we went to Ogau (I was stationed in Lenggries). He was specifically concerned about the transmitter T-195. I explained that I could test it at Lenggries and only state that it was working. I couldn't guarentted that it would work further down the road. This wasn't good enough, so he ordered a new (or rebuilt) T-195 from the Pirmaseans Depot in France. You guessed it, it started blowing smoke out of the exhaust blower vents when turned on. Wold you guarentee a light bulb to work two days later? More than likely it would, but there is also a chance it won't. Electronics systems are subject to failures of all sorts. The best way to deal with it is to go for redundency. m2cw 73, wd4air
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 253 lubricant, c-hawley |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam?, joel hallas |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Good faith & John Swisher KE4CCI (long), HUGHESRO |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Good faith & John Swisher KE4CCI (long), NJ0IP |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |