TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
From: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:09:21 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
You can't do that unless you come up with a front panel switch. The 
roofing filter follows the N buttons. Guess you'll have to get the drill 
out and poke a hole somewhere. Why do you want to do this?
N4LQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kelly <jkelly@bellatlantic.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:54:08 -0500
Subject: Re: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG

> Yes I would like to be able to have JUST the roofing filter on (alone)
> but ALSO have working filters in my N1 and N2 slot.  
> Do you see a spot on the schematic that I could safely energize the
> relay?
> 
> Jeff
> 
> > 
> > From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
> > Date: 2005/01/12 Wed AM 05:48:36 EST
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
> > 
> > I'm not sure I follow you there Jeff. Having an optional filter on
> the IF 
> > board is not required to activate the roofing filter but you still
> need to 
> > push either N1 or N2 to make it's relay kick it in line. If you
> wanted it on 
> > all the time I suppose you would just feed +dc to one of the control
> lines 
> > on the filter which would keep it's relay closed. The filter needs
> the relay 
> > even if you have the ssb roofer installed. That way it will still
> work on 
> > FM. But of course, who uses FM anyway?
> > Steve N4LQ
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Jeff Kelly" <jkelly@bellatlantic.net>
> > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
> > 
> > 
> > > Steve,
> > >
> > > I was thinking - do you think there is a way to just have the
> roofing
> > > filter on all the time without having to have N1 or N2 on?
> > >
> > > I would like to just have the roofing filter in line without
> waisting N1
> > > as a switch. If I keep the N1 and N2 filtered then I always have to
> > > have a narrow filter with the roofer.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
> > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:09 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
> > >
> > >
> > >> Be prepared to spend about $200. Small price to pay for an Omni
> VI+ +.
> > >> You get to choose either the SSB or CW roofing filter. The CW
> filter is
> > >> 600hz wide. With the programing switches, you can make it kick in
> when
> > >> hitting either N-1, N-2 or either.
> > >> It matters not if you have any filters in the option slots on the
> 9mhz
> > >> board.
> > >> This thing installs at the very beginning of the 9mhz IF chain,
> just like
> > >> the Orion. After this filter, the signal hits the OEM 15khz wide
> filter,
> > >> which has an easy job now, then through the first IF amplifier,
> which is
> > > now
> > >> happy not to have so many sigs to amplify, an on to your optional
> 9mhz
> > >> filters.
> > >> Steve N4LQ
> > >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > >> From: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
> > >> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:44 PM
> > >> Subject: RE: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > what's the cost?
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> > >> > [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Steve N4LQ
> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:38 PM
> > >> > To: tentec@contesting.com
> > >> > Subject: [TenTec] Omni VI roofing filter JPG
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Here is the completed installation of the INRAD roofing filter.
> It
> > > mounts
> > >> > on
> > >> > the final amp box toward the rear, bottom of the rig. Take a
> look.
> > >> > Oh, It works too. I noticed no loss of gain or increase of
> noise. With
> > > it
> > >> > engaged, the 250hz filters become slightly more effective. I
> have
> > > nothing
> > >> > to
> > >> > measure BDR or IMD. The next contest will tell the story.
> > >> > www.webham.com/INRAD
> > >> >
> > >> > Steve N4LQ
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > TenTec mailing list
> > >> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > >> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > TenTec mailing list
> > >> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > >> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> TenTec mailing list
> > >> TenTec@contesting.com
> > >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>