To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion |
From: | John <w3uls@3n.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:59:18 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
In a very interesting post, Steve, N4LQ, wrote: "Personally, I would much prefer the old Omni VI 563 with all the upgrades I could get. Yes, you still have to contend with the IF boards being SMD but at least the control board has good ole leaded parts." Well, well, some of us w/o such technical expertise just stumble into a good thing. My c. 1994 OMNI VI upgraded to Opt. 3 has a tcxo, a relay that grounds the aux rx antenna during transmission, competent audio even before installing the INRAD stuff, and plug #52 disconnected for a cleaner sidetone. IMHO not only may there be considerable variation in the parts/wiring of OMNI VIs as they came off the assembly line from 1992-2001, but some just seem to work better than others. Sample variations are not just limited to Ten-Tec transceivers, I've found. That's just one of the unavoidable limitations of reviews of one sample such as carried in QST and elsewhere. I think Mike Tracy has said ARRL labs does do a cross-check with another sample when it can, but it is not the thorough examination given to the test sample. Certainly keeps things interesting :-) 73, John, W3ULS _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Omni VI price re-adjustment, rr1632 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion, n4lq |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Omni VI price re-adjustment, rr1632 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Non-Confusion, n4lq |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |