To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL |
From: | "Larry Laflamme" <laflamme@ncia.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 7 May 2004 13:20:24 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
It depends on your definition of "is" Sound familiar? Larry, N1SHM > Now if I have that translated correctly, I think it means "yes, there is > interference, but since WE don't think it meets the strict legal definition > of 'harmful interference' WE don't intend to do anything about it, so go > take a long walk off a short pier." But that's just me. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL, Ron Notarius |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] How Much Damage From Reversed Polarity?, doc |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and BPL, Ron Notarius |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Skywave BPL?, JAMES HANLON |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |