The rating is very misleading for the rx340. The DSP AGC has a 60 DB limit
because of the DSP chip that was used in this receiver. The only thing that
happens when closed spaced signals are in the 20 khz roofing filter is some
quieting on the weakest signal in the roofing filter passband if the weakest
signal is more than 60 db down form the strongest signal. But the frontend
on this receiver is very strong and the IP3 point is very high. The
receiver really performs better than the Orion for a lot of things. There
are a lot more specs of high importance besides close in dynamic range.
There is no com
Carl Moreschi N4PY
Franklinton, NC
----- Original Message -----
From: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs.
> If you look at Sherwoods list of tested receivers at close spacing you
will
> notice the 340 is near the bottom of the list. I noticed he has added the
> OmniVI+ and the K2. Unfortunately the Orion and it's sub receiver are not
> there yet. I suspect the 340 beats the Orion sub receiver which I would
want
> to guess is about the same as a Jupiter or Pegasus.
>
> http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
>
> 73,
> John N1JM
>
>
>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion vs. RX-340 TT Rcvrs.
>
>
>
> > I would be interested to know how the 340 compares to
> > the Orion "sub" receiver. I thought that they were pretty
> > much the same.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|