To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion |
From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:36:32 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hi Pete, A fattened (cage) dipole is broader band than a skinny dipole, and I did not think they were lossy. Ken ac5e@comcast.net wrote: Chuckle - even back in prehistoric times we knew the only way to broadband a dipole is to make it lossy. However the reduction in field strength, while greater than a typical trap or loading inductor, is not that great. My FS tests show it to be a dB more or less.
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription, Barry N1EU |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] eHam charging for Subscription, Carl Moreschi |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, ac5e |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion, Sinisa Hristov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |