To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth |
From: | "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:58:33 -1000 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
> The bandwidth issue was addressed in the review of > the AOR product in 2/2004 QST. Great, the Feb. QST will get out here to Kauai by barge by, at least, the second week of March!!! Could pay for airmail/1st class our here, but that is about double the dues cost. Perhaps the review is at the ARRl web site, will have a look. Thanks and 73, Jim KH7M _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Decision???, Dennis Baumgarte |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Decision???, Kc9cdt |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth, Eric F. Richards |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth, Rick Westerman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |