To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] PTT vs QSK? |
From: | "Art Searle" <w2nra@birdsandbeacons.com> |
Reply-to: | Art Searle <w2nra@birdsandbeacons.com>,tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:01:14 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Lee wrote: > If ORION was designed for contesting AND weak DX work. THE WHY DID TT LEAVE > OUT A KEY FEATURE? PTT FOR CW? I don't understand why PTT is so important. Wouldn't QSK with amp be better? I've heard big gun contesters double with inexperienced ops and then go on there merry way, thinking they have a contact, but maybe not. I'm not a contester but I do listen a lot. If has already been discussed that foreshortening of the first character at 60 wpm would be imperceptible at 30 to 35 wpm (the usual contest speed - go faster than that and you'll be very very lonely). So, Why wouldn't computer keyed QSK with QSK amp be the best contest station? 73, Art W2NRA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, W B Reese |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, tongaloa |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Rick Westerman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] PTT vs QSK?, JOHN |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |