To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Re TS850-ORION; and some more thougts about the current discussions.. |
From: | Ulrich Hilsinger <dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de> |
Reply-to: | dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de, tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:17:18 +0100 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Hello, first of all thank you to everybody who sent me answers to my question concerning a possible comparison between the TS850 and the ORION. Meanwhile, I've also been reading older discussions from this mailingliste, and of course the actual ones. Some comments and questions therefor: "warbling": Did someone ever recorded this warbling during tuning, so that people interested in buying an ORION can hear this ? (Same question for the klicking in QSK mode.). Of course, one has to pay a certain price for the extremely high spectral purity of the oscillator. It's a general rule: the lower the noise, the lower the loop bandwidth. The lower the loop bandwidth, the slower the PLL. Of course, there is a big difference between using integer-N-synthesizers and fractional-N-synthesizers, too. By the way, none of those problems occurs on my TS850 :-) - I hear no warbling, it's tuned in 10-Hz-steps, and per turn I tune 10 kHz... one key pushed, and I tune 1 kHz per turn... Nevertheless, today during the DARC XMAS Contest, again I really wished to have a highly selective receiver such as that one in the ORION ... :-) And of course, the oscillator noise is not as low at the 850. IP2: Some weeks ago, there was a discussion about the IP2 figures in the QST test report. I think the reason for the constant IP2 could be, that IM2 products are generated before the amplifier. In addition, switching diodes used for the band filters are always in the signal path, a fact which can be a reason for a IP2 degradation. However, the measured value is not that bad... It is still good compared to some of the japanese toys. Where, I think, IP2 was much more important than for the ORION during the development (IP2 shouldn't be as important for the US market as for the EU market).
Ulrich, DH0GHU dh0ghu@dh0ghu.de http://www.dh0ghu.de/ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [TenTec] First dit shortening, James Duffer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review, Thomas Jednacz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] ALL ORION ISSUES!, Kc9cdt |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] FS: # 285 ...500 Hz CW Filter, rr1632 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |