To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Orion--K2--706 |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2003 16:38:56 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
S56A wrote: >There are no negatives in ON4UN Orion test report! Not exactly...I saw the following in his report: 6/ BW The measured bandwidth and resulting shape factor are: Nominal BW (Hz) -6dB BW (Hz) -60dB BW (Hz) Shape factor 100 150 440 2.9:1 TT has informed me that they will change the display so that the most narrow bandwidth displays 150 and not 100 Hz. 15/ the second receiver Whereas the TT-manual suggests that diversity reception is possible with the Orion, it really is not what I call true diversity reception. To me true diversity reception is only possible if both receivers are phase locked and that the phase delay through both receivers is nearly identical. This is not the case in the ORION. Listen to the same signal through both receivers using the same VFO, and you hear the warble (flutter, rapid fading) caused by the phase difference. This warble is always there and in my eyes makes real diversity impossible. This does not mean that under certain circumstances you may not find a benefit in using different antennas on the 2 receivers on (almost) the same frequency. While TT doesn't claim that both receivers are phase locked, they think that there are advantages when using e.g. a vertical and horizontal antenna or two horizontal antennas separated by at least a wavelength with the Orion using two radios in a single audio amplifier and claim that some of their customers have found this form of diversity with non phase-locked receivers useful. 18/ suggestions and shortcomings On the negative side: the Voice memory keyer is much too slow in saving to memory (not useful at all in a contest). I also would like to see the possibility to see different external T/R delays for SSB and CW. Now you can set one delay for output A (going to amplifier A) and another one for output B (going to amplifier B). Having separately adjustable delays for SSB and CW should only be a minor software change, I think. Suggestion: It would be nice if the user could, from his PC, upload HIS frequency /mode / bandwidth definitions (a one time task to do, without having to control the radio from a PC on a permanent basis). Doing so he could just enter a frequency from the Orion keyboard and it would selectively make a corresponding standard bandwidth, all this in accordance to his frequency / mode / bandwidth chart. We understand this cannot be a standard thing as band-planning differs in different IARU regions, and even in accordance to individual operators.
Even as I write the final lines of this report I think I have found one or two very minor control software glitches, which I know TT will correct in one of their next firmware upgrades. It's great not having to be worried about such issues, the people are there at TT to solve them, and the system is in place to provide every customer with the solution almost in real time. This is what I always dreamed about! 22/ The Orion in Europe. At this time (early October 2003) the Ten Tec cannot be sold in the EC market, as it has no CE label yet. http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/topband/2003-October/017574.html 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] [another] ORION Review, Rick Westerman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] [another] ORION Review, Paul Valko - W8KC |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] K2 vrs Orion, Donnie Garrett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Orion--K2--706, Marijan Miletic, S56A |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |