TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II
From: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:59:15 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
W9OJ wrote:
>If I could buy a K2 for $669 fully assembled then this comparison
would be more apples-to-apples.

You can Mike! Most used K2's sell for the kit cost alone. There
are even guys who enjoy building them so much that they would probably
build you a new one for free if you asked on the Elecraft reflector. The problem I see with buying one used is that many of them are loaded
with features I personally would not need (SSB, 100w, DSP, ATU, etc)
since I would plan to use it mainly for portable QRP CW and as a 2nd
receiver. As a 2nd receiver, the basic K2 is an INCREDIBLE value.


73, Bill W4ZV

At 10:01 AM 11/24/2003 -0500, you wrote:

>         I'll bet the K2 receiver ($669 including 160 and NB options) willrun
>circles around a Pro2 under these same conditions.  Don't you feel the Pro2
>should do better for another $1500?
>
><http://www.elecraft.com/K2_perf.htm>http://www.elecraft.com/K2_perf.htm
>
>Radio   5 kHz BDR (Desense measurement which applies to these problems)
>K2              135 dB
>Pro2            100 dB
>
>                                                 73,  Bill  W4ZV



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>