To: | tentec@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II |
From: | Mike Manship <w9oj@peoplepc.com> |
Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:26:16 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
At 10:01 AM 11/24/2003 -0500, you wrote: > I'll bet the K2 receiver ($669 including 160 and NB options) will run >circles around a Pro2 under these same conditions. Don't you feel the Pro2 >should do better for another $1500? > >http://www.elecraft.com/K2_perf.htm > >Radio 5 kHz BDR (Desense measurement which applies to these problems) >K2 135 dB >Pro2 100 dB > > 73, Bill W4ZV If I could buy a K2 for $669 fully assembled then this comparison would be more apples-to-apples. 73 de Mike W9OJ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] One complicated radio! [Long}, Grant Youngman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II, jmalloy |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II, Bill Tippett |
Next by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II, jmalloy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |