An even better option is an Orion, Pegasus and RX340.
2 TX + 4 RX (1 ham band and 3 gen coverage)
Perhaps Carl will come up with a control scheme for this
combo!
Greg
K7KJ
Portland, OR
k7kj@arrl.net
http://www.qsl.net/k7kj
----- Original Message -----
From: "Duane Grotophorst" <n9dg@yahoo.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2003 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RX 340 or Orion......that is the Question?
>
> --- Jim Reid <jimr.reid@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> > Now owning both an Orion and an RX-340 is rather
> > rich!
>
> On the other hand if you were going to buy both new it
> would make more $ sense to buy two Orion's. Then you
> would have both a spare TX and two really decent
> general coverage RX's to boot.
>
> 565/340 = 1 TX + 3 RX (2 general coverage and 1 ham
> band only)
>
> 565/565 = 2 TX + 4 RX (2 general coverage and 2 ham
> band only)
>
> So with two Orion's you actually get an extra TX and
> RX. If top notch SWL performance is the main
> requirement then yes the RX-340 looks to be the better
> choice.
>
> Duane
> N9DG
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|