To me this post as I read it seems in very poor taste, insulting to both
Kachina and Ten Tec. From all the ads on the bottom of your email, I assume
you are a distributor of Ham equip etc. I would think you would be a little
more careful about what you write. Accept my apologies if I mis-read it.
73,
Ken W7TS
-------------------
Kenneth E. Kinyon
34 Princeton Circle
Longmont, CO 80503-2106
Voice/fax (303) 684-0037
E-mail: W7TS@Qwest.net
W7TS@qsl.net
W7TS@arrl.net
ALPCA #8339
ARRL-LM
-------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tentec@contesting.com [mailto:owner-tentec@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Radiodan W7RF
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 16:14
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Kachina discontinued
Was it that Ten Tec had it all over the Kachina? Or the price difference?
I never really looked into the major differences between the Pegasus and
Kachina. On the surface they seemed very similar but much cheaper.
Now that Kachina is gone, how soon for a "new & improved" Pegasus (with MUCH
higher price tag)?
73, Dan Magro W7RF, (President WARC 1999, member SCDXC, SCCC)
Manufacturers Rep & Distributor for HENRY RF Power Amplifiers.
BIRD Power Measuring equipment, Still THE most accurate in the world!
Tohtsu coaxial relays, Samlex 25A power supply, Maha batteries & chargers
www.radiodan.com <http://www.radiodan.com/> RFpower@radiodan.com
<mailto:RFpower@radiodan.com> A trip to our web site is worth the click!
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
|