To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77 |
From: | reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W) |
Date: | Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:23:21 -0700 |
Hmmm, that's interesting. It seems to me that QST should not have published that review (or should have informed the readers of this fact), or assigned the project to a more "objective" reviewer. Who was this "turkey"? I always though the Delta II/Argo II were neat little rigs in their niche. Reid, K7YX -----Original Message----- From: Carl Hyde [mailto:cshyde@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 28, 1999 7:46 AM To: jreber@es.com; seweber@netnitco.net; walter@inlink.com; TenTec@contesting.com Subject: RE: [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77 You have to understand the story behing the review of the Delta II that was published in QST. The author of that article had already accepted a job position with Kenwood USA when the article was writte. What better opportunity to prove loyalty to your new employer than to eliminate some competition before starting a new job with the competition -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77, Simmons, Reid W |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] I want a really good receiver, rjlees@juno.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Scout VS. DX-77, Simmons, Reid W |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Delta II / Argo II review, Clark Savage Turner |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |