May be that part of that answer depends on what we see when the software
interface is published.
have you ever looked at the 320 software interface...it tells you a lot.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Smith <tds59@im4u.net>
To: Carl R. Gansen <wb0cff@hotmail.com>
Cc: tentec@contesting.com <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 11:57 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Pegasus
>
>I'm sending this to BOTH parties (i.e., Carl and you on the
>reflector)...
>
>What would be interesting is comparing the Pegasus receiver to the Omni
>VI...as well as the two rigs' "upgradability" factor. By that, I pose
>this: There has been some observation made about the main competitor to
>the Pegasus (read: the big Kahuna) being able, through such routes as
>added boards or PCMCIA-type cards, to offer VHF/UHF capability among
>other things. How about the Pegasus' expansion future? I know there are
>several slots available in the Omni VI (as I recall my notes and visual
>observations of a couple of these rigs in the past)...wonder if the
>Pegasus has been set up similarly...
>
>Tom N8DXR
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
>Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|