To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply |
From: | PEPLASTERS@mail.rkd.snds.com (Paul Plasters) |
Date: | Thu, 07 May 1998 06:55:00 -0500 |
What antenna does work for 160, that a city dweller can erect? Say on a 50 by 100 lot. o~ _[-/)_ (_)\/\(=)-ooo... Ride to live-Live to ride "peplasters@rockford.com" Ask me about an indoor air polution control device! >>> Ronald D Rossi <rrossi%btv.ibm.com@internet.rkd.snds.com> 05/06/98 02:35pm >>> > Empirically only a problem if you have a descent antenna on 160m. I find that there are many more stations I can hear than I can work. I have tried a short top loaded vertical w/ 6 radial (pretty poor) and an 80m dipole matched for 160 fed with 450 Ohm line (even worse). TT Omni-D Series B > > Clark > WA3JPG > > -- > FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm > Submissions: tentec@contesting.com > Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com > Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com > Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm > -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Ten Tec Net This Sunday, RICHARD ANDREN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply, Steve Ellington |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M, Steve Ellington |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] TenTec for 160M -Reply, Steve Ellington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |