On 19 Dec 2001 at 18:31, Dale L Martin wrote:
>
> Why would one need to delete the ? at all? The software could probably be
> coded to do so.
>
> If the ? prompts the station to repeat his/her call and it's good, then no
> callsign in the exchange field should do the following:
> 1. Remove the ? from the callsign window
> 2. proceed with the normal TU message and NOT send the Call OK Now message
>
> A callsign in the exchange field would prompt:
> 1. The correction of the call
> 2. The removal of the ? from the callsign window
> 3. The Call OK Now message.
>
>
> Seems a simple thing to check for in and remove from the call window.
>
I'm quite satisfied with TR not letting me log the QSO as long as there is a ?
in the
call. Do you want to trade the risk of a busted call for that tiny rate
increase?
I think KL7RA has the right solution with the @? in an F-key (the
think-I-got-it-but-
not-sure-about-your-call-key). Then you will need a ? in the call window only
when
you definitely miss a character, and then you should not be able to log.
73, Udo
--
73, Udo
dl2zav@darc.de
Ich funke mit TR-Log von N6TR:
http://www.trlog.onlinehome.de
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|