Subject: | [SECC] GQP re-defined |
---|---|
From: | w8ji at contesting.com (Tom Rauch) |
Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:35:08 -0500 |
> > The kicker is that K4TCG is NOT eligble for any awards > > from the QSO Party. > That was OK with us here. I had a friend, Greg, a newbie, > KI4TCN, over and he > operated the VHF-UHF station when Becky was busy. Although > activity was slim, he > did get some contesting expierence. Good idea. That makes sense. Allowing multiple stations to use the "special call" is a great idea, and the idea of not allowing the special call to earn any award is just how it should be. 73 Tom |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] GQP re-defined, Tom Rauch |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] GQP re-defined, ku8e at bellsouth.net |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] GQP re-defined, Ny4n at aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] GQP re-defined, ku8e at bellsouth.net |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |