Daniel Jeswald wrote:
The word I hear on this subject is they are basically trying to save
their proposal of the Amateur WINLINK EMAIL SYSTEM. They have
obviously gone the way of Washington DC and OWE SOMEBODY BIG TIME.
Otherwise why would the League, the "supporter" of Amateur Radio,
overtly persue the total destruction of the bands by allowing
un-attended 3 KHZ WIDE signals in HF and above?
Just for information, the ARRL withdrew in a secondary filing that
max "3 kHz" wide bit, which effectively allows even greater
bandwidths.
Aid it was an "unintentional" mistake.
Usual BS
73
Ed
|