SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] 2007 GQP -- How about county line ops to stimulate activity?

Subject: [SECC] 2007 GQP -- How about county line ops to stimulate activity?
From: greyeagl at bellsouth.net (Gordon)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:06:43 -0500
My vote is no.  It is entirely too easy to simulate a county line where no 
public roadway exists.  Plus, many rivers and streams serve as county line 
borders here in Georgia and elsewhere.  Unless one was in a watercraft of 
some sort and in midstream, one would be in one county or the other but not 
on the county line.  Let's work at getting more rovers out there so ALL 
counties can be activted and also ..... keep it simple.... no county line 
operations.

Gordon - K4OD

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Olson" <w4jo at bellsouth.net>
To: <secc at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:35 PM
Subject: [SECC] 2007 GQP -- How about county line ops to stimulate activity?


> May I suggest that we allow county line operation for our Georgia QSO 
> Party?
>
> Reasons:
>
> 1.   I found it to be very enjoyable in the Illinois and Texas QSO Parties 
> in 2006.
> 2.   We have so many counties to activate in our state
> 3.   People that work Georgia want to work as many counties as possible. 
> To use an analogy that DXer Martii Laine (OH2BH) used when referring to 
> dxpeditions:  We, the Georgia ops, are the actors on the stage.  The 
> audience is comprised of those hams inside and outside Georgia that want 
> to fill up their logbook with a clean sweep of Georgia counties.
>
> Regards,
>
>  James Olson, W4JO
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>